Sendpilot Alternative: 10 Tools, Cost per Sender Compared

Key Takeaways

• Sender count decides the shortlist. One profile points at Waalaxy from €19 per user a month or Linked Helper from $29.90; ten or more points at HeyReach or Expandi.
• Sendpilot's entry tier is its worst value. Launch costs $79 a month for one sender against $28 per sender on Agency (checked 11 October 2026).
• Credits run a second meter. Scoring and enrichment draw on a monthly allowance, so the subscription line is a floor rather than a total.
• Replies stop being automated everywhere but one place. meetergo agrees the time inside the LinkedIn thread; the other ten raise a notification and wait for a person with a calendar.
• One vendor here publishes what its AI does with your text. Every other row records silence rather than guessing at an unwritten policy.

Sendpilot sells on a line most of this category avoids: you pay per sending account rather than per person. That is genuinely better for an agency and quietly worse for a solo seller, and the gap between those two cases is what sends people looking. Every figure below carries its billing unit and the date it was read.

First, Check You Are Comparing the Right Sendpilot

Two products share this name, and search results mix them freely. The one covered here is the LinkedIn outreach platform at sendpilot.ai, listed on G2 as Sendpilot AI, which runs connection campaigns, a shared inbox and inbound comment automation. A separate social media scheduling product also trades as SendPilot and has a G2 seller page carrying no reviews at all.

The practical consequence is that half the "Sendpilot pricing" figures circulating on comparison directories belong to one product or the other, and some belong to neither. Three third-party listings consulted while writing this gave three different entry prices for the same plan. Everything attributed to Sendpilot below came from the vendor's own pricing page, read on 11 October 2026, and the plan names are theirs.

What Sendpilot Does, and What a Sender Really Costs

Sendpilot is LinkedIn automation aimed at agencies and sales teams, and it reaches wider than a sequencer. Outbound campaigns cover profile views, post likes, connection requests, messages and voice notes, with variables in the templates. Replies land in a shared inbox the vendor calls Unibox. An ICP scoring layer ranks those replies.

Beyond outbound there is inbound automation that fires a DM when somebody comments on your post, plus a post scheduler, a post generator and a lead magnet generator. No email sending channel is included, and no CRM ships with it.

Pricing attaches to connected sending accounts rather than to people on the team.

Prices checked 11 October 2026 on the vendor's pricing page. Annual billing is advertised as two months free. Extra senders bolt on at $79 a month on Launch, $49 on Growth and $29 on Agency, and a 7-day trial opens without a card.

Divide by senders and the shape of the product becomes obvious. Launch works out at $79 per sender a month on monthly billing. Growth lands at $66. Agency lands at $28. An agency running twenty-five client profiles pays roughly a third of what the single-profile buyer pays per account, which is the correct design for the customer Sendpilot is built around and an awkward one for everybody else.

Customer Reviews

G2 records 4.5 from 209 reviews (checked 5 October 2026), a sample deep enough for the average to carry weight. Reviewer attention clusters on setup speed, the price relative to larger platforms and responsive support, with the recurring criticisms running to occasional bugs, thin analytics and features whose behaviour is not obvious on first use. Several reviews describe a product still filling gaps rather than a settled one, which matches a vendor whose cheapest tier does not yet include webhooks.

The Three Lines the Price Table Does Not Show

Comparison directories reproduce the plan grid and stop. Three things that move the real bill sit outside it, and all three survive a switch to most of the alternatives below. None of them get much airtime in the hands-on roundups either, including a r/Entrepreneur write-up testing the outreach tools in this category one by one.

Credits run on their own meter

Each plan carries a monthly credit allowance: 800 on Launch, 4,000 on Growth, 20,000 on Agency. ICP scoring and enrichment consume them. A quiet month leaves credits unused and a heavy month exhausts them, so the subscription is a floor rather than a total. Enrichment also applies to leads sourced inside the platform rather than to a list you bring with you, which narrows what the allowance can be spent on. Budget for a consumption line, the same way you would for lead qualification tooling anywhere else.

The cheapest tier cannot talk to your CRM

API keys, webhooks and the native HubSpot and Slack connections all start at Growth (checked 11 October 2026). A solo seller on Launch therefore runs an outreach tool that cannot push a won reply anywhere automatically, which makes $79 a month buy less integration than several cheaper per-user products on this page. If a connected pipeline matters, the effective entry price is $329 a month for five senders you may not need.

Nothing in the stack books the meeting

A prospect answers, the reply gets scored, and then a human opens a calendar, works out overlapping availability, writes out three times and pastes a link. That gap is invisible on every pricing page in this category and it is where warm threads go cold, which is the thing speed to lead measurements have been describing for years. Scoring tells you which replies deserve the effort. It does not remove the effort. The recurring r/sales question about which LinkedIn automation tool people run turns over sequencers repeatedly and barely touches what happens after the answer arrives, which is a fair reflection of how the category markets itself.

The 10 Sendpilot Alternatives at a Glance

Each row carries the cheapest paid tier the vendor publishes, with the unit it bills against, what one sending account costs at that tier, and what the vendor states publicly about AI data retention and model training.

Competitor prices and ratings checked 5 October 2026 unless noted otherwise. "Not stated" means nothing published on the subject could be found and quoted. Treat an empty cell as missing paperwork rather than as a finding about how any vendor handles your data.

1. meetergo: Best for Booking the Meeting Inside the Chat

meetergo is a scheduling and revenue platform built in Cologne, with dedicated coverage for sales, recruiting, consulting and a number of other verticals. Its LinkedIn app is the only entry here that closes the conversation instead of handing it off: the assistant, Mira, agrees a time inside the thread, so the lead never opens a scheduling page. Charges attach to each connected LinkedIn account rather than to a person, so five profiles cost the same whether one operator or five work them.

Key Features

Booking inside the LinkedIn conversation

Once a lead agrees to talk, Mira pulls free slots from the calendars you connected, shows them in the lead's own time zone, confirms the one they pick, attaches a meetergo video link, and writes the appointment into the calendar and the CRM together. Rescheduling happens in the same thread as the original conversation.

Seven routes into a campaign list

Leads arrive from LinkedIn search, Sales Navigator, Recruiter, reactions on a post, attendees of an event, a CSV upload, or contacts carrying a CRM tag. A single import takes up to 1,000 profiles and fills in the background at human pace rather than in one burst. Links copied from an "All" results page get rewritten as a People search on the way in.

Sequences that fork on acceptance

One campaign can chain a profile view, a like on a post published within the last 14 days, a connection request carrying a note, then messages sent as text or as a voice recording. After a wait of up to ten days it splits on whether the request was accepted, so nobody keeps receiving messages they cannot read. A campaign can run across several sender accounts at once, and results report as leads, accepted, replied and interested.

One inbox for LinkedIn, WhatsApp and email

Replies land in a shared inbox carrying WhatsApp, email and chat alongside LinkedIn, company pages included. You can answer with text, images, files or a voice note, set a status, snooze a thread, or save the person to the CRM in one click. Mira tags each incoming reply as interested or not, which keeps a real yes from sitting behind a queue of polite refusals. Visibility is tiered: admins see every account, team admins see their team's, everyone else sees their own, and a private mode limits the view to conversations meetergo started.

Pricing

Prices exclude VAT and attach to connected LinkedIn accounts, with 10% off from ten accounts and 20% from twenty-five. Paid tiers open with a 7-day trial and the full tier list sits on meetergo pricing.

Where meetergo Shines

• The slot gets confirmed while the prospect is still reading the thread, closing the gap scoring layers can only measure.
• Per-account pricing holds steady as headcount changes, which per-seat pricing does not.
• One database sits under the campaigns, the CRM and the LinkedIn CRM view, so a lead never has to be exported from outreach and loaded into pipeline.
• A confirmed booking, a deal changing stage, a lost deal or an answered connection request can each fire workflow triggers, which lets a booked call start its own preparation steps.
• Execution sits on EU servers, so no machine has to stay awake for a sequence to advance.

Where meetergo Falls Short

• Automation covers LinkedIn only, with no Instagram, X or general web extraction.
• No content scheduler or post generator exists, so the inbound half of Sendpilot has no counterpart here.
• Buying the app does not replace the plan subscription underneath it, which means two lines on the invoice.
• Branching amounts to a single accepted-or-not fork, well short of a multi-condition funnel.

Customer Reviews

The LinkedIn app carries no independent rating. It has no G2 or Capterra listing, and borrowing a score another meetergo product earned would say nothing about this one, so the table cell stays empty deliberately. The gap is genuine. Every other tool here can be judged by people who paid for it and wrote about it afterwards; this one cannot be, yet. The figures that do exist are vendor-reported. The sales solutions page claims up to 80% fewer no-shows, sales cycles around 30% shorter and 40% more booked demos. Those came from the vendor, not from reviewers, and should be read at that discount until independent ratings exist.

Who meetergo Is Best For

• Teams losing deals between an answered message and a scheduled call rather than on message volume.
• Buyers whose procurement process requires outreach, inbox, scheduling and CRM to sit under EU jurisdiction.

Curious whether an in-thread booking step moves your own reply-to-call rate? Open a free meetergo account and put one campaign through it. Unlimited users, no card required.

2. HeyReach: The Closest Swap at the Same Entry Price

HeyReach is the nearest structural match on this page. It also charges by sending account rather than by seat, also pools threads from every connected profile into one inbox, and also prices its larger tiers for operations sending on other people's behalf. Entry sits at the same $79 a month for a single sender. The scope is narrower than the product it would replace: no inbound comment automation, no content scheduling or post generation, no email lane without a second subscription, no CRM, and an answered message still waits for a person holding a calendar.

Key Features

Pooled sending across accounts

One campaign spreads itself across every connected sender and paces each one separately, which is the mechanic agencies change tools to keep.

Unified multi-account inbox

Threads from all connected profiles collect in a single view, sparing an operator covering five client accounts from a day of signing in and out.

Volume-priced agency tiers

Per-account cost falls sharply once you move past the entry plan, which is the whole argument for the bigger tiers.

Pricing

Prices checked 5 October 2026.

Where HeyReach Shines

• The billing unit matches what you already buy, so a migration needs no spreadsheet to compare.
• Pacing is configured per account, which matters when connected profiles differ in age.
• Twenty-five senders work out at $40 each, cheaper per account than most per-user tools at any count.

Where HeyReach Falls Short

• Single-sender value is weak against per-user products costing half as much.
• Coverage is LinkedIn messaging only, so email means buying something else.
• Nothing covers the inbound side, so comment-triggered outreach has to be rebuilt elsewhere.

Customer Reviews

G2 shows 4.6 from 73 reviews (checked 5 October 2026). That average is the highest in the table, but 73 ratings is the second-smallest sample on this page, so it carries less weight than the 4.5 scores built on several hundred. A thread in r/SaaS comparing LinkedIn and cold outreach tools head to head places it against Dripify and Snov.io, which is roughly the bracket its reviewers describe.

Who HeyReach Is Best For

• Agencies and sales teams running ten or more sending profiles at once.
• Buyers who want to keep per-account billing and are willing to lose the content and inbound features.

3. Expandi: Best for Managed Identities and Branching Campaigns

Expandi answers the account-safety question at the infrastructure layer. Each connected profile gets a dedicated country-based IP, new accounts warm themselves automatically, and sending stays inside ranges an operator cannot raise. Rather than sending one fixed path to everybody, campaigns branch according to what the prospect does. Two costs come attached: a single plan priced for a team with nothing cheaper underneath it, and configuration depth that reviewers complain about more than anything else. CRM, video conferencing, content scheduling and booking are all outside the box.

Key Features

Conditional campaign logic

Splits can be set on a profile view, an accepted request or a reply, which makes the next message depend on the last action.

Dedicated country-based IP per account

Each profile sends from a fixed address matched to its country, so proxy configuration never reaches your desk.

Enforced limit ranges and automatic warm-up

The vendor's ranges are the hard ceiling, and fresh accounts ramp on a schedule the operator does not set.

Pricing

Prices checked 9 October 2026. The 7-day trial opens the full feature set.

Where Expandi Shines

• Branching funnels are built as branches instead of being approximated with timed delays.
• Identity management is handled by the vendor, which removes a class of setup work.
• Ceilings operators cannot raise protect accounts from ambitious targets.

Where Expandi Falls Short

• The flat plan costs more than one Launch sender and more than most per-user options.
• Time to first campaign is what reviewers raise more than any other issue.
• Email can run inside the same sequence, yet putting a time in the calendar remains manual.

Customer Reviews

Expandi sits at 4.3 on G2 from 162 reviews (checked 5 October 2026). That is the lowest average in this comparison, though the spread across all eleven tools is only three tenths of a point. What reviewers return to is how long the first campaign takes to build rather than failed sends or lost lists, and a difficult first week is a different complaint from an unreliable product. A r/b2bmarketing thread weighing it against HeyReach as a PhantomBuster replacement works through the same trade in public.

Who Expandi Is Best For

• Growth teams whose funnels genuinely fork and who have somebody on staff to maintain them.
• Operators who want account handling solved at the infrastructure layer.

4. Dripify: Best for Cutting the Bill on One or Two Senders

Dripify is where a single-profile seller goes to stop paying agency-shaped prices. Execution runs on the platform, the drip builder is deliberately linear, and an entry seat costs half the Launch tier it would displace. The ceiling matches the price. Anything beyond a straightforward follow-up chain cannot be built, no CRM comes with it, no content or inbound tooling exists, and an interested reply lands in a human inbox awaiting a calendar check.

Key Features

Linear drip campaigns

Steps fire in order with gaps between them, which covers the connect-then-follow-up rhythm most outreach runs on, with no flowchart to maintain.

Cloud execution

Sequences progress overnight and through weekends from the vendor's platform, with activity paced separately per account.

Team reporting

Figures for activity and responses roll up across seats, so a manager can compare reps without opening each account.

Pricing

Prices checked 5 October 2026.

Where Dripify Shines

• An entry seat comes in at half the cost of a single sender elsewhere.
• No proxy or identity setup is required, so a first campaign can go out the same day.
• Cross-seat reporting exists without collecting screenshots from each rep.

Where Dripify Falls Short

• Conditional funnels have no equivalent, so branching is given up entirely.
• Per-user charging reverses the saving for an agency, since each sender consumes a seat.
• Turning a reply into a booked meeting always needs a person in the middle.

Customer Reviews

Dripify holds 4.5 on G2 across 353 reviews (checked 5 October 2026), matching the average of the tool this page is about on a sample nearly twice the size. Reviewer attention clusters on setup speed rather than ceiling, which is the usual trade for a linear builder. A discussion in r/automation about what people run for LinkedIn outreach has it among the tools participants have used and hold views about.

Who Dripify Is Best For

• Solo sellers and small teams who want cloud sending at the lowest credible price.
• Operators who never used the scoring or inbound layers they were paying for.

5. Waalaxy: The Cheapest Credible Entry Point

Waalaxy is the lowest figure on this page for a sequencer that works. It runs from a browser extension, charges per user, and sets up in an afternoon because no hosted identity or proxy is involved. The saving arrives with its own ceiling. Close the browser and the campaign stops, which rules out overnight progress, and there is no pooled sending layer, so an agency ends up with one seat and one browser session per client. CRM, content scheduling and inbound automation are all absent, email credits are bought separately from the seat, and turning a reply into a calendar entry stays a manual job.

Key Features

Extension-driven sequences

Campaigns execute inside your own browser session rather than through a hosted identity, keeping activity attached to the device you already use for LinkedIn.

Prebuilt campaign templates

Ready-made sequences cover the usual patterns, so a first cadence starts from something rather than nothing.

Email enrichment as an add-on

Email addresses can be found and attached to LinkedIn leads, with those credits charged separately from the seat.

Pricing

Prices checked 5 October 2026. All three headline rates assume an annual commitment.

Where Waalaxy Shines

• €19 per user is roughly a quarter of a single Launch sender.
• Template cadences give a first campaign a starting shape.
• Setup involves no identity configuration at all.

Where Waalaxy Falls Short

• That yearly rate is half the list price as a promotion, so budget against what renewal will cost.
• Every added account brings another seat and another browser session, and nothing shows them together.
• Nothing runs while the browser is closed, so campaigns pause whenever the machine does.

Customer Reviews

Waalaxy carries 4.5 on G2 from 1,604 reviews (checked 5 October 2026), the second-largest review base in this comparison. Sixteen hundred ratings make an average about as stable as this category produces, and the reviewers behind it lean solo and small-team rather than agency. A r/gtmengineering walkthrough reviewing the LinkedIn automation tools tool by tool places it in the same bracket.

Who Waalaxy Is Best For

• Solo sellers and founders handling outreach from a single LinkedIn profile.
• Anyone cutting the outreach line in the budget as far as it will go.

Five More Sendpilot Alternatives Worth Knowing

These five answer narrower questions. Each one solves a specific problem properly while serving the typical reader of this page badly.

Linked Helper

Installs as a desktop program instead of running as a hosted service, from $29.90 a month (checked 5 October 2026), the lowest price for a full sequencer in this comparison. The compromises follow from the architecture: no shared team inbox, a separate install and update per operator, and campaigns that only advance while that machine is running. Switching here trades the cloud, the pooled inbox and the scoring layer for a bill roughly a third the size, and the migration options get their own treatment in our guide to Linked Helper alternatives. G2 rating: 4.5 from 149 reviews.

lemlist

Built first for cold email, which is still where the depth sits: deliverability controls, inbox warming and multichannel sequences, with LinkedIn attached as one lane rather than the centre. On yearly billing the email tier runs $55 a month and Multichannel $87 (checked 5 October 2026). LinkedIn steps only appear on the higher of the two, so $87 is the number that belongs in this table. Pacing controls for individual LinkedIn accounts are thinner than in the LinkedIn-first tools, and nothing here covers CRM. It earns a place here for anyone whose real gap was the missing email channel. G2 rating: 4.6 from 2,323 reviews, more ratings than anything else on this page, though most of those reviewers arrived for the email side.

La Growth Machine

Prices by identity rather than by seat or by sender, on annual billing: Basic €50, Pro €100, Ultimate €150 per identity a month (checked 5 October 2026). One identity packages a rep's LinkedIn profile, email address and phone number together, which fits teams whose sequences really do use all three. Scaling gets expensive quickly, because every rep buys the whole bundle whether or not all three get used. The 4.6 G2 average rests on 57 ratings, the shallowest sample here, so treat it as an early reading rather than a settled one.

PhantomBuster

Less a sequencer than a meter. The unit of sale is automation time across many networks: €56 a month buys 20 execution hours and €352 buys 300 (annual billing, checked 5 October 2026). The design leans toward pulling data out rather than keeping a conversation going. Work halts when the hours expire rather than when the list does, which is an awkward shape to budget a continuous programme against. It is worth a look when list building rather than sequencing is the actual bottleneck, and the switching options get full treatment in our guide to PhantomBuster alternatives. G2 rating: 4.4 from 138 reviews.

Dux-Soup

Ships in two deployment shapes priced far apart. The local version installs as a desktop application and uses your own machine and session at $55 per seat a month on monthly billing; the cloud version executes on the vendor's infrastructure at $99 (checked 10 October 2026), with 25% off either on annual commitment. Local execution appeals to teams who would rather no outside party hold a live session for their LinkedIn profile, and the trade is that campaigns halt whenever the laptop does. Seat-based charging makes it a poor fit for anyone currently paying per sending account, and the full picture sits in our guide to Dux-Soup alternatives. G2 rating: 4.4 from 90 reviews.

What Happens to the Text Your AI Assistant Reads

AI now touches the message copy, the reply scoring or both in most products in this category, the subject of this page included. What almost none of them publish is where that text goes once a feature is switched on. The text in question is named individuals, the companies they work for, whatever they let slip about budget, and the reason they said no.

For ten of the eleven tools here, no quotable statement about retention or training could be found, and that absence is what the "Not stated" column reports. That silence is not evidence of wrongdoing. What it does mean is that the answer arrives, if at all, only after your prospect data has already left the building, which is not a sequence a buyer under regulatory review can accept.

meetergo is the exception, because the position is published. The models behind Mira are open ones, served from Mistral's platform in Paris and, through Melious in Germany, from EU hosting. Both operate under zero data retention, which means a prompt and the LinkedIn conversation behind it get processed into a response and are then discarded: not retained, not used for training, and not sent to a US AI provider at any stage. The vendor's FAQ answers this under the question of whether inputs are stored. Documents you upload to the knowledge base are a separate case: they persist as embeddings in an EU store kept apart from booking records.

The rest of the posture follows the same line. There is no US corporate parent, so no CLOUD Act reach needs working around and no Schrems II gap needs arguing past. That is the reason the company appears on GDPR software shortlists and in data sovereignty reviews. Put procurement's question about where the prompts end up to the table above, and one row produces a citable answer.

More Senders Means More Accounts Exposed

Per-sender pricing has a second-order effect worth naming before you scale into it. Cheaper accounts at volume make it rational to connect more profiles, and every connected profile is a LinkedIn account that can be restricted. The economics push one way and the risk pushes the other.

Worth saying plainly too: LinkedIn's user agreement prohibits automated access and scraping. No vendor on this page changes that, and neither does a warm-up schedule, a dedicated IP or a daily ceiling.

What those controls really do is make restrictions less frequent. Caps on daily volume, gradual ramps on new accounts, actions spaced at human intervals rather than fired in batches, and pacing tied to profile age. On meetergo, profile views and likes draw on one shared daily budget set to 30 by default and capped at 80. A newly connected account spends three weeks at a quarter, then half, then three quarters of its limits before reaching full rate, and nothing fires outside the working hours you set. Only the account owner can raise a limit, switch warm-up off, or resume sending after a restriction. Expandi's unraisable ranges belong to the same family of controls.

Every one of these controls is risk management on an asset that belongs to LinkedIn rather than to you. Any promise of immunity is marketing.

Where to Start

Count sending accounts first, because that number decides most of this. One profile points at Waalaxy from €19 per user a month or Linked Helper from $29.90. Ten or more points at HeyReach's pooled tiers, or Expandi if your funnels genuinely branch. None of those choices touches replies that never become calls, which is the gap meetergo's LinkedIn app exists to close. Wider context sits in our roundup of LinkedIn automation tools and in sales enablement software.

Stop handing warm threads a booking link and let the time get agreed in the chat instead: try meetergo at no cost. Unlimited users on the free tier, and a 7-day trial on anything paid.

FAQs

What is the best Sendpilot alternative?

It depends on how many LinkedIn profiles you send from. One profile makes Waalaxy at €19 per user a month on yearly billing or Linked Helper at $29.90 a month the obvious cost cut, both well under the $79 Launch tier. Ten or more profiles makes HeyReach the closest structural match, since it also charges per sending account and pools the inbox. If your losses happen between an answered message and a booked call rather than in sequencing, meetergo is the only option listed that settles the time inside the LinkedIn thread.

How much does Sendpilot cost?

Four tiers, priced by connected sending account. Launch is $79 a month monthly or $66 annually for one sender and 800 credits. Growth is $329 monthly or $274 annually for five senders and 4,000 credits. Agency is $699 monthly or $583 annually for twenty-five senders and 20,000 credits, and Enterprise starts at $1,000 a month with unlimited senders (all checked 11 October 2026). Extra senders cost $79, $49 or $29 a month depending on tier, and annual billing is advertised as two months free.

Is there a free Sendpilot alternative?

None that will carry production outreach. A 7-day trial without a card is standard across the category, Sendpilot included, and meetergo operates a free plan with unlimited users, though its LinkedIn app is a paid add-on at €29.90 per connected account a month. Treat any free tier as a place to learn how sequences behave rather than a place to run a live programme.

What do reviews say about Sendpilot?

G2 shows 4.5 from 209 reviews (checked 5 October 2026). Praise concentrates on setup speed, price relative to larger platforms and support responsiveness. Criticism concentrates on occasional bugs, limited analytics depth and features whose behaviour is unclear until you use them. Several reviews describe a product still filling gaps, which is consistent with webhooks and native integrations sitting above the entry tier.

Which Sendpilot alternatives work for agencies?

HeyReach is the closest, pricing twenty-five sender accounts at $999 a month, around $40 each. Expandi sells an agency tier from ten seats on request and handles identity management centrally. meetergo charges €29.90 per connected LinkedIn account with 10% off from ten accounts and 20% from twenty-five, which is the cheapest per-account figure on this page before volume discounts apply. Per-user tools like Dripify and Waalaxy work against you here, because each client profile consumes its own seat.

Does any Sendpilot alternative book meetings automatically?

One does. meetergo's assistant proposes times drawn from your connected calendars in the lead's own time zone without the conversation leaving LinkedIn, confirms the slot they pick, attaches a video link, and files the result in both the calendar and the CRM. Rescheduling happens in the same thread. The other nine notify you that a reply arrived and hand the booking back to a person.

100% GDPR compliant

Booking + video conferencing in one tool.

No downloads.No extra costs.Set up in 30 seconds.

Use for free

Sarah NowakManaging Director · Intro call · 30 min09:0010:3014:00

100% GDPR compliant

Booking + video conferencing in one tool.

No downloads.No extra costs.Set up in 30 seconds.

Use for free

Sources

• G2 aggregate scores and review counts read 5 October 2026: Sendpilot AI, HeyReach, Expandi, Dripify, Waalaxy
• Practitioner discussions referenced in the review sections: r/Entrepreneur, r/sales, r/SaaS, r/b2bmarketing, r/automation, r/gtmengineering
• Vendor list prices read from each provider's own pricing page between 5 and 11 October 2026, with the exact date given next to each figure. Competitor pricing pages are not linked from this article; the figures carry the date they were checked instead.